5 Responses

1. Candace A. Gee

   25|Jan|2010 1

   My brother got me the ipod shuffle for my birthday- but luckily the nano was released within 30 days of my return by date!!!! so i got the white nano- there were 2 guys at the apple store returning the black ones because the screen was all scratched up. they ended up going with the white because it’s harder to see scratches.

   knock on wood- i have not experienced any defects with the nano casing or lcd screen. (in reference to the numerous lawsuits being filed)

   the color screen is amazingly clear. i wear super tight ultra low rise jeans and the nano easily slips into my front pocket!

   i’ve never owned, touched, or used an ipod previous to this gift- but i use mac. being able to use my “magic bone” (yeah i’m one of those nerds who name inanimate objects) for ical, contacts, and notes is simply fabulous! currently i’m running jaguar so i had to use isync to synchronize my files- but it’s really not a big hassle… though i may change my mind when i upgrade to tiger later on this week. i kept reading info saying you HAD to have 10.4— NOT TRUE! you just have to do one extra step- click the options button on itunes.

   if you’re going to get a nano- get the 4GB!!!! I’m probably going to give my 2GB to a friend and buy the 4GB… 500 songs is really not enough… plus- i had to delete the entire song directory just so i could download some applications from a friends computer. if you plan on using the nano for data storage and music- get the 4GB!!!!

   SENUTI- google it- i didn’t realize til last week that you couldn’t transfer music FROM the ipod nano TO your computer. This program is freeware- and works perfectly for transfering music files. using the nano with Tiger is just one step easier for syncing your ical and contacts- but i still don’t think its necessary to run tiger with your nano.
   Rating: 5 / 5

2. Anonymous

   25|Jan|2010 2

   I have done research on Apple Ipods and have found that within one or two weeks they have to be sent back because they broke of just flatt out stopped working.
   Rating: 1 / 5

3. Anonymous

   25|Jan|2010 3

   a lot of people in the reviews were comparing this with the ipod mini. im sorry you cant compare the 2 i dont have this ipod and i dont want it because frankly these things are getting to be out of control. the ipod mini was the perfect size even though they are thicker than the nano you would know it is there and you wouldnt break it by accident( a lot of people i know did)and also i hear about the other ipod nanos that they stop working after a while. and making these things even thinner was stupid considering that the other ipod nanos were too thin in the first place. Why couldnt they just make a ipod mini with a color screen?
   Rating: 3 / 5

4. Anonymous

   25|Jan|2010 4

   I really want one!!! just so bad! i hearit scratches easily!

   
   Rating: 5 / 5

5. Bookish

   25|Jan|2010 5

   What is it about Apple that makes them think it is ok to just keep redoing the same product over and over and over again. How many versions do you need??? First ipod mini, than ipod nano Now, it is Nano SECOND GENERATION! Big deal, if you could just make the ipod nano right the FIRST time you would not need to do it again. Could it be just for hype? Could it be just another way to get MORE money out of ipod devotees??? How about really improving it by adding a radio? Sooner or later the well will run dry!
   Rating: 3 / 5